Loading...

Environmental Performance Index: A Tool to Enhance Environmental Policymaking

lilac and green wetlands visual with illustrated birds above and white abstract EPI logo

24 August 2022 | New Haven, USA – In this piece, postdoctoral associate Martin highlights features of the 2022 Environmental Performance Index (EPI) and explains how such constructed metrics can support transformative change and signal the path toward more sustainable economic and societal growth. The 2022 EPI – produced by researchers at Yale and Columbia Universities – leverages cutting-edge scientific insights and the latest data to highlight the best environmental policy practices and move countries around the world towards a more sustainable future.

[Author: Martin Wolf, Yale Center for Environmental Law and Policy] 

New Haven, USA – In this piece, postdoctoral associate Martin highlights features of the 2022 Environmental Performance Index (EPI) and explains how such constructed metrics can support transformative change and signal the path toward more sustainable economic and societal growth. The 2022 EPI – produced by researchers at Yale and Columbia Universities – leverages cutting-edge scientific insights and the latest data to highlight the best environmental policy practices and move countries around the world towards a more sustainable future.

lilac and green wetlands visual with illustrated birds above and white abstract EPI logo

 

Introduction

Data-driven environmental metrics can improve public health, enhance ecosystem vitality, and focus attention on real-world sustainability issues – but only if leaders embrace scientific insights and act on the critical issues that metrics highlight. For over 20 years, the Environmental Performance Index has provided policymakers, researchers, the media, and the interested public a tool to gauge the adequacy of their country’s sustainability policies and identify worrying trends in environmental degradation (see Box 1 and Reference 1). 

The latest EPI report, released in June 2022 by Yale and Columbia Universities, ranks 180 countries on 40 performance indicators across 11 issue categories covering climate change, biodiversity, air quality, and other critical topics in environmental health and ecosystem vitality (see Figure 1). The overarching rankings as well as the scores on specific issues spotlights leaders and laggards, highlighting best environmental policy practices that countries can adopt from top-performing peers. Viewed in the aggregate, the EPI’s global scorecard indicates which issues the world is tackling and identifies the issues requiring more concerted international policy interventions.

 

Figure 1: 2022 EPI Framework Wheel, which includes 40 performance indicators that fall into 11 issue categories, aggregated into three policy objectives, with weights showing the percentage of the total EPI score (source: 2022 EPI) 
 

The power of data to improve environmental decision making  

Our era is defined by ever-more-comprehensive information systems, positioning individuals and organizations around the world to demand that their governments validate environmental performance programs and progress with data. The quantitative targets laid out in the Sustainable Development Goals, the Paris Climate Agreement, and the Convention on Biological Diversity, demonstrated that policymakers now face intense scrutiny over the results they report regarding both international and national environmental commitments. The rise of sustainability metrics provides a mechanism for holding governments that fail to meet their pledges accountable.

Empirically-grounded analyses also promise to improve environmental policies in countries making good-faith efforts to advance sustainability by making it easier for policymakers to spot problems, communicate with stakeholders, explain complex scientific concepts, identify best practices, and derive the greatest benefits from their investments in environmental solutions. 
The 2022 Environmental Performance Index offers a scientifically grounded and analytically robust sustainability scorecard to help policymakers zero in on their country’s top priorities, identify successful and practical policies, and implement planetary solutions to preserve natural resources and enhance environmental health.

 

Lessons from the 2022 EPI

Several striking conclusions emerge from the 2022 EPI report and analyses:

  • First, global action on mitigating climate change remains fundamentally insufficient to meet international targets ratified in the 2021 Glasgow Climate Pact. Only a few countries – notably, Denmark and the United Kingdom – are currently on track to reach net-zero greenhouse gas emissions by mid-century, reflecting the need for many nations to redouble their efforts to reduce emissions, expand carbon sinks, increase energy efficiency, and invest in clean energy sources. Current trends are not a country’s destiny, however. The EPI analyses help leaders identify their top-performing peers and adopt policies to pull down their greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions trajectories.
     
  • Second, the latest data suggest policymakers are missing the chance to rebuild economies and societies in a more sustainable way following the COVID-19 pandemic. For example, air pollution and GHG emissions have rebounded to pre-pandemic levels almost everywhere as companies, communities, and individuals return to their prior production, consumption, and transportation practices, rather than seeking pathways to a more sustainable future. As countries strive to rebuild their economies, leaders are learning that a return to status quo policies will erode the gains in environmental performance realized over the past few years. 
     
  • Third, the 2022 EPI demonstrates that at every level of development, some countries outperform their economic peers. Sustainable development requires financial resources to increase investments in public health and environmental infrastructure. The widely spread scores among wealthy countries, however, demonstrates that good governance also matters. Cutting-edge analyses of the 2022 EPI rankings make clear that the factors explaining environmental success include good governance, country wealth, social prosperity, independent media, and well-crafted regulations. The team found strong correlations between EPI scores and government effectiveness, rule of law, regulatory quality, happiness, and GDP per capita. Leaders that carefully manage pollution threats and natural resource consumption can drive their countries toward a more sustainable future.

 

Figure 2: Overall Country Rankings (source: 2022 EPI Report)
 

Conclusion

The 2022 Environmental Performance Index embraces a new era of data-driven decision-making, where sustainability policies, business investments, and consumer choices are grounded in scientific research and transparent methodologies. By carefully measuring environmental performance, highlighting critical results, identifying leaders and laggards within peer groups, and spotlighting best practices in the policy domain, carefully constructed metrics like the EPI can support transformative change and signal the path toward more sustainable economic and societal growth.
 

How the EPI works

EPI indicators provide a way to spot problems, set targets, track trends, understand outcomes, and identify best policy practices. Good data and fact-based analysis can also help government officials refine their policy agendas, facilitate communications with key stakeholders, and maximize the return on environmental investments. The EPI offers a powerful policy tool in support of efforts to meet the targets of the UN Sustainable Development Goals and to move society toward a sustainable future.

Overall EPI rankings indicate which countries are best addressing the environmental challenges that every nation faces. Going beyond the aggregate scores and drilling down into the data to analyze performance by issue category, policy objective, peer group, and country offers even greater value for policymakers. This granular view and comparative perspective can assist in understanding the determinants of environmental progress and in refining policy choices.

Funding from the McCall MacBain Foundation of Canada supports the EPI work at both Yale and Columbia. The EPI research team is deeply grateful for this generous support.

 

Reference

1. M.J Wolf, JW Emerson, DC Esty, A de Sherbinin, and ZA Wendling, et al. (2022), “2022 Environmental Performance Index” (New Haven, CT: Yale Center for Environmental Law & Policy); link: epi.yale.edu.

About the author

Martin Wolf, PhD, is a postdoctoral associate at the Yale Center for Environmental Law & Policy (YCELP). He joined YCELP in August 2020 as principal investigator for the Environmental Performance Index. Martin received a PhD in Climate Science from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in 2020 and his research focused on aerosol-cloud interactions and the climatic impacts of industrial emissions. Prior to joining the YCELP, he was a Mirzayan Science & Technology Policy Fellow at the U.S. National Academy of Sciences’ Board on Environmental Change and Society in Washington, DC, USA.